Category: Corporate Compliance

  • Organizational Values & Business Risks: Properly Balancing Stakeholder Concerns

    Organizational Values & Business Risks: Properly Balancing Stakeholder Concerns

    Topics Covered

    Accommodations. Appropriate accommodation for high-risk employees or employees with family members who are at a heightened risk.

    Mitigation. Attention to means of mitigating transmission and infection.

    Tracing. Contact tracing and management of data collected, including health data, as well as responses to employees who refuse to report.

    Patient Sensitivity. Duty to avoid discrimination and stigmatization.

    Preparedness. Developing plans to address possibility of re-occurrence in the fall and managing possible outbreaks in company’s offices.

    Take it now

    On-demand on the Thomson Reuters West LegalEdcenter as part of the HB catalog.

    Register now!

    Organizational Values & Coronavirus Business Risks:
    Properly Balancing Stakeholder Concerns

    Produced for Emory University Center for Ethics by HB Litigation Conferences

    The current pandemic confronts businesses, nonprofit organizations, governments, and the legal profession with innumerable ethical challenges.  Management issues and liability concerns, stakeholder demands and legal duties become even more complex in an environment of uncertainty and one where the consequences could result in serious illness or even death.  This program seeks to engage the participants in thinking through these challenges and developing processes of ethical response to them.  Managers must acknowledge and address the framework of fear associated with the pandemic, ranging from fear of contagion and death to fears of unemployment, childcare, and the duties of home-schooling.  Additionally, as the economy reopens there must be serious attention to the processes of doing so.

    Join Professor Edward L. Queen from Emory University for invaluable insights. Emory’s medical team was on the frontline of the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic, which began in December 2013 when an 18-month-old Guinean boy contracted the disease. According to the CDC, the outbreak ended with more than 28,600 cases and 11,325 deaths. Eleven people were treated for Ebola in the United States.

    Edward L. Queen
    Director of Ethics and Servant Leadership
    Emory University

    Professor Queen Coronavirus-Ethical-Issues-Litigation Conferences-June-19-2020-

    Professor Edward L. Queen

    Edward L. Queen is director of the D. Abbott Turner Program in Ethics and Servant Leadership and Coordinator of Undergraduate Studies at Emory University’s Center for Ethics.  At Emory he also serves as Director of Research for the Institute of Human Rights and co-convener of the Initiative on Religion, Conflict, and Peacebuilding.  Queen received his B.A. from Birmingham-Southern College, his M.A. and Ph.D. degrees from the Divinity School of the University of Chicago, and his J.D. from the Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis. Queen’s previously served as founding director of the Religion and Philanthropy Project at the Indiana University Center on Philanthropy and of the Islamic Society of North America’s Fellowship Program in Nonprofit Management and Governance.  A former program officer at Lilly Endowment, Inc. with a major responsibility for grants in nonprofit governance and leadership, Queen has consulted with numerous nonprofit, governmental, and educational organizations on management issues and ethics policies.  These organizations have included the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights, the Pew Charitable Trusts, Independent Sector, USAID, NAFSA: The Association of International Educators, the Southeastern Council of Foundations, and the Corporation for National and Community Service.

    A specialist in issues related to professional and social ethics, religious and ethnic conflict, and civil society, Queen has written, coauthored, or edited numerous books, including Serving Those In Need: A Handbook for Managing Faith-Based Human Services Organizations (2000), Philanthropy in the World’s Traditions (1998), and The Encyclopedia of American Religious History (1992, rev. ed. 2002, 3rd rev. ed. 2009).

  • Microsoft Sued Over Data Sharing in Class Action

    Microsoft Sued Over Data Sharing in Class Action

    Microsoft Sued Over Data Sharing in Class Action

    Consumers, including individuals and companies, filed a class action complaint  against Microsoft in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, claiming the company shared consumer data without consent to subcontractors and third parties, including Facebook, despite policies that stated otherwise. 

    The plaintiffs accused Microsoft of “misrepresenting its privacy and security practices, violating federal and state law, and illegally sharing and using its business-class Microsoft Office 365 and Microsoft Exchange customers’ data.” 

    Read more from Law Street Media: https://lawstreetmedia.com/tech/microsoft-sued-over-data-sharing-in-class-action/

  • Healthcare Industry Antitrust Measures Advance as Pandemic Pressures Persist

    Healthcare Industry Antitrust Measures Advance as Pandemic Pressures Persist

    Healthcare Industry Antitrust Measures Advance as Pandemic Pressures Persist

    Did consolidation help frustrate U.S. COVID-19 preparedness?

    Clearly antitrust enforcers must consider external circumstances like the COVID-19 crisis when making enforcement decisions, and the agencies have bene able to pivot to respond to this crisis remarkably quickly. It is important, however, to also consider whether and how these emergency COVID-19 collaborations will unwind once the crisis has subsided. Collaborating competitors will have already shared critical information and resources, and that momentum can be difficult to halt.

    Jennifer M. Oliver, Partner, MoginRubin LLP

    READ MORE

    Jennifer M. Oliver
    Partner
    MoginRubin LLP

  • The Dark Net:  Anonymity, Infrastructure, and the Future

    The Dark Net: Anonymity, Infrastructure, and the Future

    Register

    Webinar Info

    Wednesday, Aug. 5, 2020

    United States
    8am PT | 10am CT | 11am ET

    United Kingdom
    4pm BST

    Get CLE or CPE, a complete set of materials, and answers to your questions!

    Email us your:
    Speaker questions
    CLE questions

    Topics Covered

    Physical and Logical Topology and Method of Data Transmission

    Using the Dark Net for Threat Hunting

    Hacking Groups and Malicious Hackers  

    The Future of The Dark Net and Anonymity

    The Dark Net: Anonymity, Infrastructure, and the Future
    Is the Dark Web Getting Darker? 

    Wed., Aug. 5, 2020 | Produced for Access Data by HB Litigation Conferences

    The web, however singular it may seem from behind an everyday user’s computer or smartphone screen, comprises three distinctive parts: the public net (or web), the deep net, and the dark net. Though the dark net contains some innocuous content and is used for legitimate purposes, it also operates as a platform for illegal marketplaces. These offer almost anything a criminal or cybercriminal might want to buy or sell like malware, exploits, hackers-for-hire, information lifted from data breaches, censored content, and goods like drugs, guns, and other contraband.

    Observers report that the dark web is getting darker, meaning hardcore criminals make up a greater percentage of its user base. Exploits and other hacking tools and techniques used to disrupt business, critical infrastructure, and misappropriate confidential information are continually diversifying and becoming more complex. According to Cyber Defense Magazine, the annual cost of cybercrime damages to users, online businesses, and nations is expected to hit $5 trillion this year, with some estimates ranging as high as $10 trillion.

    Join two highly experienced data security professionals – Mary T. Frantz of Enterprise Knowledge Partners and Frank Krahn of Burdock Consulting – as they discuss how cybercrime fighters must overcome a variety of challenges as they threat-hunt on the dark net: detecting, monitoring, and gathering intelligence on cybercrimes and the actors behind them. Frantz and Krahn will discuss how the cybersecurity community will address emerging threats, what changes the web may undergo as a result, and more. The session will be moderated by the head of international training at AccessData, Sarah Hargreaves, who brings her own experience in forensics to the discussion.

    Meet our panelists.


    Frank Krahn
    Co-Founder, Burdock Consulting, LLC

    Before co-founding Burdock Consulting, Frank had a long tenure with the Mayo Clinic, where he served as the Director of Operational Risk Management. He holds various specialist certificates in information security and computer crime investigation and forensics. Frank has taught classes and consulted for law enforcement agencies on computer crime-related matters, and has worked with the FBI. He is also an e-discovery specialist.


    Mary T. Frantz

    Founder & Managing Partner, Enterprise Knowledge Partners, LLC

    Mary is a technology and strategy professional with more than 25 years’ experience as a corporate and consulting firm executive. Her expertise includes IT strategy, e-discovery, compliance, enterprise risk, information security, and enterprise architecture. Mary has served as a legal expert on a variety of cyber security topics. She is also an author, keynote speaker, and adjunct professor.


    moderator

    Sarah Hargreaves ACI, ACE
    Director of Training – International
    AccessData, United Kingdom

    Sarah started her career in digital forensics in 2003.  Previously working in a criminal law practice, Sarah moved over to forensics after working on a number of investigations which inspired her to change career path.  Her journey continued with a number of roles in Digital Forensic Laboratories, primarily supporting law enforcement in Child Sexual Exploitation investigation and general crime.  Sarah progressed to Laboratory Management and later into Training Management.

    Sarah is experienced in digital investigation, laboratory management, ISO17025 and evidential process.

    Sarah lives in the North West of England and is a mum to two young children.  She enjoys days out with her family and traveling.

  • Contract Drafting Fundamentals

    Contract Drafting Fundamentals

    Contract Drafting Fundamentals with Will Marshall

    Register Now

    Contract Drafting Fundamentals:
    What I Wish They Taught Me in Law School

    Speaker:

    Will Marshall | Partner
    UBM Law LLP

    Date:
    Thursday | July 23, 2020

    Time:
    2pm ET
    1pm CT
    12pm MT
    11am PT

    Duration:
    75 minutes

    Price:
    Early Bird Registration: $75
    After July 14: $95

    Special:
    Complimentary with discount code!

    What you get:

    • CLE credit

    • Course materials

    • Webinar recording

    • Answers to your questions!

    Contact CLE Manager

    Get practical insights on contract drafting.

    For new and seasoned attorneys alike, this 75-minute program will cover core, practical aspects of contract drafting, including a broad range of fundamental concepts, skills, and tips.  The program is designed to make you a more deliberate drafter and improve your ability to assess the purpose and effectiveness of each provision in your contract.  We will discuss not only what is on the page, but external dynamics that affect drafting and negotiation. Finally, we will reserve time to answer your questions.

    I am offering this program for free to my network to help you develop these foundational skills. If you haven’t received it, please contact me directly for the complimentary pass code.  — Will Marshall,  Partner, UBM Law Group LLP

    Key topics: 

    • The goals and challenges of good drafting.

    • The anatomy and building blocks of a contract.

    • Categories of contract language.

    • Typical sources of ambiguity.

    • Tips on everything from file naming conventions to how to draft a nested signature block and what a tipping basket is.

    • Your questions via live chat or by email before or and after the event.

    Send Will a Question

    Meet our panelist.

    Will Marshall

    Will Marshall | Partner
    UBM Law Group, LLC

    UBM Law Group

    Will is a co-founder of UBM Law Group. He has substantial experience in drafting and negotiating a wide range of commercial contracts, including SaaS and traditional software licensing agreements, supply, distribution, and professional services agreements, and confidentiality agreements.

    Prior to co-founding UBM Law Group, Mr. Marshall served as General Counsel and SEVP of Operations of Javo Beverage Company, a publicly traded manufacturing company in Vista, California. As one of the founding executives of Javo, he was integral in leading the ground-up capitalization and commercialization of the company over the course of a decade and he uses his in-house and executive experience to help his clients negotiate clear, effective contracts.

    Read more about Will Marshall here …

  • Organizational Values & Coronavirus Business Risks | Join Our Webinar June 18

    Organizational Values & Coronavirus Business Risks | Join Our Webinar June 18

    Webinar:
    June 18, 2020
    2:00 pm ET
    60 mins.
    CLE: 1+
    Complimentary with registration.

    Get:
    +CLE
    +Materials
    +Recording
    +Answers!

    Also available to subscribers of the West LegalEdcenter.
    Register there!

    Email us your:
    Speaker questions
    CLE questions

    Speaker:

    Professor Edward L. Queen Ph.D. , J.D.
    Director Ethics and Servant Leadership: Emory Center for Ethics
    Emory University

    Organizational Values & Coronavirus Business Risks
    Properly Balancing Stakeholder Concerns

    Thursday, June 18, 2020 | 2pm ET | 1pm CT | 12pm MT | 11am PT 

    The pandemic brings with it complex liability concerns, stakeholder demands and legal duties.  We will take a closer look. 

    The current pandemic confronts businesses, nonprofit organizations, governments, and the legal profession with innumerable ethical challenges.  Management issues and liability concerns, stakeholder demands and legal duties become even more complex in an environment of uncertainty and one where the consequences could result in serious illness or even death.  This program seeks to engage the participants in thinking through these challenges and developing processes of ethical response to them.  Managers must acknowledge and address the framework of fear associated with the pandemic, ranging from fear of contagion and death to fears of unemployment, child care, and the duties of home-schooling.  Additionally, as the economy reopens there must be serious attention to the processes of doing so, including:

    We will address:   

    • Appropriate accommodation for high-risk employees or employees with family members who are at a heightened risk;

    • Attention to means of mitigating transmission and infection;

    • Contact tracing and management of data collected, including health data, as well as responses to employees who refuse to report;

    • Duty to avoid discrimination and stigmatization;

    • Developing plans to address possibility of re-occurrence in the fall and managing possible outbreaks in company’s offices.

  • Canna Law Blog Reviews Hemp-CBD Regulations State-by-State, Week-by-Week

    “When it comes to hemp, few states have embraced it like Colorado,” writes Harris Bricken attorney Daniel Shortt. “If you buy a product containing hemp, in any state across the country, it likely came from Colorado.” The state has allocated more than 12,000 acres of outdoor space and 2.35 million square feet of indoor space to hemp cultivation, according to Marijuana Business Daily.

    Shortt and his colleagues are working their way through a state-by-state series on the Canna Law Blog™, titled Hemp-CBD Across State Lines. The Harris Bricken team has covered Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas and California, and added Colorado to the list yesterday, July 21.

    The firm’s series covers state regulatory activity following the enactment of the federal Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, aka “The Farm Bill,” which removed hemp and its derivatives from the definition of marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act. The bill gave the USDA regulatory authority over hemp cultivation at the federal level, but states may maintain primary regulatory authority over the crop cultivated within their borders by submitting a plan to the USDA, Shortt explains.

    Read the Canna Law Blog’s Colorado post and follow this series, updated weekly.

    Related Webinar This Week

    The Harris Bricken law firm has been on the forefront of the law regarding cannabis and related products for years. Three Harris Bricken attorneys, Daniel Shortt, Nathalie Bougenies, and Griffen Thorne — plus Anastasia Gilmartin, General Counsel at CBD product maker OLEO Inc. — will discuss how the legal landscape of hemp-derived CBD is affecting various stakeholders.

    They will:

    + Discuss both the 2014 and 2018 Farm Bills
    + Analyze the FDA’s position on products containing hemp and/or CBD (including food, beverages, cosmetics, dietary supplements, drugs, and smokeable products)
    + Provide an overview of state laws
    + Share insights on where this industry is headed
    + Answer your questions via live chat

    Learn more

  • Nevada to try limited banking for cash-heavy pot industry — ElkoDaily.com

    Most marijuana dispensaries are forced to handle massive amounts of cash. Business owners are paying their employees with envelopes full of dollar bills, and bringing duffle bags full of money to government buildings to pay their taxes.

    That could all change with the new Nevada state law that allows dispensaries to offer a cashless option. This program will be tested for three years before being considered as a permanent feature. State Treasurer Zach Conine likened the system to gift cards or digital apps such as Venmo and said the program would not include broader banking services like loans. Since marijuana is still not legal federally, states are on their own with coming up with a cashless option. Hawaii took similar steps and included a debit payment app, which has spread to other states as well. California lawmakers are also devising a cashless system by creating a class of banks specifically for the industry. This temporary law is set to take place by July 1, 2020 with the hopes of easing transactions and lessen cash handling for customers and businesses

    Read the complete post by Michelle L. Price on ElkoDaily.com here! 

  • Wells Fargo Proposes to Settle Auto Insurance Case for $386M — Yahoo!

    In 2017 customers of Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) filed a class action lawsuit alleging the bank forced unwanted auto insurance without permission from the customers. Currently WFC plans to pay around $386 million to settle the 2017 class action lawsuit. The high payout is due to the sheer number of customers affected. About 270,000 WFC customers were “pushed into delinquency ” and “almost 25,000 wrongful vehicle repossessions.” In addition to the class action settlement, WFC will be reaching out to individual customers offering financial service recovery, and restructuring their leadership teams. WFC is still seeing a decrease in sales and their numbers. In six months WFC shares “lost 4.5% against 6.5% growth recorded by the industry.”

    Read the complete post on Yahoo! here.

  • The Future of Cyber Operations and the Government

    In the forthcoming National Defense Authorization Act the House Armed Services Committee — specifically the Subcommittee on Intelligence and Emerging Threat Capabilities — seeks to amend the annual legislation to ensure that Congress is informed when the executive branch executes offensive or defensive cyber operations.

    The bill defines offensive or defensive cyber operations as a “sensitive military operation.” The goal of this shared information is additional oversight, especially given the newness of cyber tactics.

    As reported by journalist Derek B. Johnson of FWC.com, two covert cyber operations have taken place since POTUS announced the new policy. The first was in October 2018, a cyber operation with a goal of informing Russian operatives not to meddle with the midterm election. The second took place the following November in which the U.S. Cyber Command blocked access to Russian Internet Research Agency post election.

    While these two operations have been called “mild” in some critiques, former White House Director of Cyber Infrastructure Protection under President George W. Bush, Jason Healey, believes this highly specialized tactic is ideal since it presents the least potential for collateral damage. While Healey warns against grand and overt attacks, he states that sometimes “conflict is straightforward and you just have to stop adversaries from punching you in the mouth.”

    Read the complete post by Derek B. Johnson on FCW.com here.