Tag: Professional Liability

  • The Cloud: Selected Benefits, Risks, and Insurance Coverage Issues (Part 1) — Barnes & Thornburg

    Cloud Risk: Do You Transfer Liability Along with Data?

    Many of us were using data clouds before we even knew what they were. Now, while most of us are comfortable with the concept, we may not be comfortable knowing who is liable when data is lost, damaged or breached. It’s not a given that your cloud provider absorbs any liabilities, and it’s not a given they can even afford the liability should it arise. Below are quotes from an article by Scott Godes, Kara Cleary, and Heidi Fessler of Barnes & Thornburg LLP on the subject, and a link to their complete article. 

    Godes, Cleary, and Fessler list several cloud-related risks: data breaches, data loss, interruption of access, compromised credentials and broken authentication, and denial of service.  But two other categories for concern are: 

    #1. BYOC, or Bring Your Own Cloud. Employees may be innocently using productivity applications that store work data on non-company clouds, in effect, “bringing their own clouds” to the workplace.

    #2. Multi-Tenancy. This involves risks posed when unrelated cloud users are sharing the same computing resources. 

    “Both the cloud provider and the user must be aware of system and data security to prevent a breach in the security. In addition, when a risk is realized, it may not always be clear who is at fault for the system or security failure.

    “There are a lot of misconceptions around the cloud and liability,” the Barnes & Thornburg attorneys write. 

    “Many companies assume that along with the transfer of their data, they have also transferred their risk to the cloud provider,” they say. “Absent a clear agreement that shifts liability to the cloud provider, the practical reality is that in most cases, there’s very little protection in terms of liability with cloud providers, unless parties are willing to engage in protracted litigation to determine otherwise. The shifting of liability is not nearly as easy as the transfer of data and often it may be the case that the responsibility for a data breach rests with the party that collected and maintained the data originally. Perhaps the most notable exception has been in the healthcare industry, where companies providing support often are classified as ‘business associates’ under HIPAA and might be subject to the same obligations for protecting data as the entity with the original patient relationship. Even here, one could argue that liability transfer does not occur, but rather a liability expansion that includes the cloud provider.” 

    Read the complete article, the first in a series, on the Barnes & Thornburg blog.

  • Alliance of Women Trial Lawyers | First Fall Conference 2018 | Oct. 27-29, 2018 | New Orleans


    [one-third-first]

    Contact
    Nancy Holston
    Founder
    Alliance of Women Trial Lawyers
    nancy@awtriallawyers.com


    DETAILS

    When
    Oct. 27-29, 2018

    Meeting Venue
    Ritz-Carlton
    New Orleans

    LEARN MORE

    REGISTER

    Prices

    The Alliance is all about women helping women so they’re offering discounts to anyone who brings a law student, clerk, or first year associate to the conference with them.

    • 1st and 2nd Attendee: $895/Attendee

    • 3 or more Attendees from same firm: $795 each

    • 1 Attendee with Guest (Law Student, Clerk or 1st Year Associate): $1,295 for Attendee and Guest

    • More than 5 Attendees please fill out their Contact form or call Nancy Holston at 850-304-9674 for more information

    To Register by Check: Click here for Payment by Mail Registration Form.

    [/one-third-first] [two-thirds]

    New Alliance of Women Trial Lawyers Announces First Event in New Orleans

    Congratulations to Nancy Holston on the formation of the Alliance of Women Trial Lawyers. HB is proud to support this group and a mission that is dear to our hearts — promoting the careers of women professionals.

    Nancy has been successful at building events for plaintiff attorneys — some you may have probably attended! — and it’s great to see her strike out on her own to develop something she believes in.

    Take a minute to learn more about the AWTL, and see who is speaking at their first event.

    AWTL Vision

    To create a community that inspires and empowers women trial lawyers, the Alliance is passionately committed to the purpose of the family of women lawyers. We support women who take responsibility for successful relationships with other professionals. The Alliance of Women Trial Lawyers advances the influence and impact of women in the legal community.

    We aim to represent the intelligence, creativity, complexity and diversity of women lawyers’ experience — across nation, ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation and economic background.

    The Alliance will provide an environment for women lawyers to lead, inspire, and mentor other women lawyers. We hope to help women litigators to embrace their power, purpose, and value, and to take responsibility for their relationships.

    Check out the complete agenda and faculty!

    [/two-thirds]

  • Miller Friel: Opioid Suppliers Are Right to Expect Insurance Coverage

    An excerpt from a post by Bernard Bell of Miller Friel PLLC

    “Because insurers are facing a difficult time evading coverage for opioid claims, they are raising all sorts of non-contractual defenses to avoid coverage, including a ‘social insurance’ argument they have raised in the past.

    “If past public health crises are prologue, these arguments will run something like this: Holding insurers responsible to pay for the costs of public services, including health care, will transform private party liability insurance into social insurance to underwrite public health epidemics caused by all manner of ills.  According to insurers, this will, at a minimum, increase the cost of liability insurance, and financially harm liability insurers, who have not priced this risk into their premiums.  Moreover, holding insurers liable to pay will shift costs away from those best equipped to address the social problem; the companies that supply the opioid products.

    “These arguments are inconsistent with insurance law, which permits parties to freely contract to cover risks, and which place the burden on insurers to pay for insured risk, even if they made an error in underwriting.  Courts interpret insurance contracts according to their language and construe them against insurers if they are ambiguous, and in favor of an insureds’ reasonable expectations of coverage.

    “Moreover, to the extent courts are inclined to look past contract language when construing insurance policies, the social arguments cut in favor of coverage, not against it, because  liability insurance is designed to perform risk management, and deterrence and compensation functions of insurance are important to the social functioning and ordering of society. … These social purposes are especially easy to grasp in the context of pharmaceutical companies that develop and bring to market countless products, including opioid pain medicine, that can relieve human pain and suffering. These companies bought and paid for liability insurance to manage the risks inherent in their business. They are entitled to enforce the promises made to them by those insurance companies that accepted their risks and their premiums.”